Ed School
December, 2004
Faculty and administration at ed schools across our fine country are over-burdened with collecting (nonexistent) “evidences,” “artifacts,” and “products” that they must use to fill the cells in “matrices” governed by “rubrics” so they can be “aligned” with the “standards” and “best practices” required by certifying organizations (extortion rackets) such as National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) and Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC).
With all that high-level intellectual labor, perfessers and administrators have little time to create
catchy mission statements that are as smarmy, cloth-headed, delusional, and
corn-fed stupid as they need to be to satisfy the milk-livered, rump-fed, fustilarian gas bladders who run universities.
However--and follow me closely
here---Professor Plum’s Dear Readers are of the intelligent, kindly, and
generous sort. Surely THEY would like to help ed
schools. See if YOU can create a completely psychotic mission statement.
Just use the following words to fill in blanks in the mission statement framework.
Or not, as they case may be.
endeavor strive
needs committed commitment
serve ensure
equity students
multicultural diverse welfare
dispositions
tirelessly vim and zip
all groups lifelong society
significant
segments social justice
learning attainment of global
as much intellect sack of
hammers stupid morally perverse
collectively thrashing
thumping head
We at the Windypants
College of Education are ___________
to ________________________ the
______________________ of all
__________ in a
_________________ and ________________
society. We also__________to
_______________ that all of our
__________________ acquire the
________enabling them to
make __________________
contributions to the __________
of ___________________ on a _________________
scale. Our
graduates are ______________________ to
the________________
of all_____________ of society, and work
__________________
and with no little ________________ to ensure _____________.
We realize that we have about _______________________
as the average __________________________; that our whole
language and fuzziest math programs are so
_______________
and _______________________ that we
_____________________
deserve a good _________________ and a
serious ________________about the
____________________.
See how easy it is? I think we should
be consultants!
But now the accountability. Is YOUR
fictive mission statement as revolting as the REAL thing--namely the
samples below, which I deftly lifted from websites of colleges of deaducation.
If not, try again. Or not, as you prefer.
Sample 1.
Teachers are the sculptors of the future. [Oh, great
metaphor! I bet they really strained for that
one. See, the idea is to give the impression of a certain artsiness. They don't just have some small effect
on the future. Oh, no! They SCULPT it. Of course, this
depends on locale. Ed schools in
Sample 2
This one receives **First Prize** in the Makes You Wanna Barf category. It's so deranged. So puerile. So bottomlessly
moronic.
Our mission and vision will be guided by the
values of creativity, connection, culture and caring. [How
are a mission and vision GUIDED by values? Are the mission and
vision independent of the values? Isn't
actualizing the values the mission itself? No? Then these
guys are just insane. (Sorry. It had to be said.) Besides,
how are creativity, connection, culture, and caring VALUES? They might be
THINGS to BE valued, but they are not themselves values. Gee, does
this tell you why these guys create such useless programs for ed students? Ya
think?! But now, let's look at these values, shall we? ]
Creativity is openness and curiosity to explore new
and different ideas; willingness to share, learn, and experiment; the strength
to persevere; and, sometimes, the courage to let go. [What kind of escaped mental patient could possibly see THIS
as a definition of creativity? Willingness to share?
Strength to persevere? The
courage to let GO? Let go of WHAT? Why let go?
Why not hold ON? Let someone ELSE
let go. Let THEM pitch in! I love the use of
"sometimes" in "and, sometimes,
the courage to let go." It adds the
dramatic touch. Psychotic, to be sure, but dramatic.
"Oh, we would so love to hang on but sometimes, Oh, Sometimes, we
must let go."]
Connection brings people together, fosters internal
and external collaboration, relationships, and networking, builds capacity, and
adds to our understanding of complexity. [Connection
"brings" people together?
What sort of gibberish IS this? Connection IS
BEING together. I guess they never heard
of VERBS, like CONNECTING!! ]
Culture is exemplified through developing
competence related to diverse cultures, individuals, perspectives and values
that create an environment of acceptance, appreciation and respect and justice
for others. [In what strange and terrifying universe is THIS a definition of culture?
"...developing competence related to diverse cultures..." Competence
at WHAT related to diverse cultures? They have NO idea. You see,
most folks at ed schools are completely incapable of
ANALYSIS. That's why they can't operationally define any concept.
Why they can't take what is good from several methods and integrate it.
Why they can't design instruction (which requires analyzing a skill into its
elements).]
Caring is ethics and integrity shown through
empathy, compassion, and a commitment to celebrate others, which ultimately
improves our collective social, educational, psychological, and physical well
being. [A commitment to
celebrate others? Why do we have to make a commitment to celebrate?
Why can't we just DO it? When we feel like it? But,
on the other hand, what if we DESPISE some others. What if we hate
their guts? See, again, maximum hyperbole because they cannot
THINK. The part about improving well being.
Gag!]
Sample 3.
This one is as foul and loathesome as the
others. But it raises the bar on empty rhetoric. Future
generations--in contrast to past generations--will look upon this mission
statement as the last word in sheer mealy-mouthed nonsense. But see for
yourself.
The graduate level Early
Childhood/Elementary Teacher Licensure Programs hold a social justice
perspective towards ["hold a...perspective towards"?
What's that mean, if anything? How do you hold a perspective? Do
you grab it by its knobs?] education,
curriculum, and teaching. [How are curriculum
and teaching not PART of education? Idiots!] From
this perspective, the purpose of education is to promote a democratic society
based on principles of social justice and economic equity. [You
understand, of course, that these guys have NO idea what they're talking
about. Social justice means what? You think they ever read The
Republic, or or any classical writers on this? Of course not. This is merely mouthing marxian flapdoodle that gets their
glands all excited.] Schools and education should be laboratories for
democracy, [Oh, Lord!
What maltworms.] where
adults and children learn together to raise questions about issues and
problems, ["raise questions about issues and problems..."
Well, that's clear enough, don't you think?] both of a cognitive and social-critical nature,
and they work together to find the answers to those problems. [Adults and children are going to raise questions about problems
and issues of a cognitive nature? Yes, I see lots of kids
doing that. "Uh, I have a problem--or possibly an issue. What
the hell are you taking about?!"]
Sample 4.
I love this next and, by the Mercy of the Good Lord, last one. It's such
a shameless display of steroid-enriched asininity.
This one packs more doltishess per line than any I've
seen.
The philosophy of the School of Education
has as its basis confluent education [Oh, great, aNUTHER
new "idea" in a field distinguished by a new and terrifying idea
every minute.] which perceives learning [Confluent education
"perceives" learning? Is this supposed to be sane?] the merging of cognitive, affective, social, and psychomotor
domains. [Don't you mean LIFE, morons?] This belief [All of
sudden it's a belief? Where was I when the change occurred, or took
place, or happened?] underscores the
premise [How does a belief UNDERSCORE anything? What does it even
mean? Surely nothing at all.] that education nurtures [They ALL say nurture.
Or foster. What ass started that trend? They can't say PRODUCE
because then they could be held accountable. But nurture?
"Oh, sure, we nurture. We nurture like nobody's business. Oy, do we ever nurture. You could plotz
with all the nurturing going on here. Not only do we nurture, we also
foster. We are big time fosterers. And promoters.
And don't forget encourage. We don't ACCOMPLISH a damn thing. But
boy can we nurture." ] and
promotes intellectual growth and the emotional, social, and physical well being
of all students with a special focus on diversity and equity. [One
big fat psychotic circle. X does X
because X is a premise for X. And then they just drop off
"diversity and equity"and expect them to
walk home by themselves.]
Hopeless. Just
hopeless. And sick. And hopeless.